Stats: Vanderbilt and the SEC

Here's a look at how No. 21 ranked Vanderbilt statistically compares with the best and the worst of the SEC.

PASS EFFICIENCY DEFENSE  (rat)

1. Mississippi Sate 87.58
9. Vanderbilt  104.68
12. Mississippi 124.63

FUMBLES RECOVERED (tot)

1. Mississippi State 5
2. Vanderbilt 4
10. Tennessee, LSU, Arkansas 0

FUMBLES LOST (tot)

1. LSU 0
10. Vanderbilt 5
11. Auburn 6

KICKOFF RETURNS (ypr)

1. Florida 27.60
6. Vanderbilt 21.77
12. Auburn 17.75

NET PUNTING (ypa)

1. Florida 40.58
5. Vanderbilt 36.76
12. Tennessee 22.00

PASSING OFFENSE (ypg)

1. Arkansas 286.00
12. Vanderbilt 80.75

PASS DEFENSE (ypg)

1. South Carolina 96.25
12. Vanderbilt 240.00

PASSING EFFICIENCY (avg)

1. Georgia 157.85
6. Vanderbilt 122.87
12. Mississippi State 103.97

PASSES INTERCEPTED (tot)

1. Vanderbilt 10
12. Arkansas 1

PUNT RETURNS (ypr)

1. Florida 24.60
2. Vanderbilt 22.50
12. Mississippi State 4.43

RUSHING OFFENSE (ypg)

1. Alabama 236.75
3. Vanderbilt 220.00
11. South Carolina/ MSU 113.25

RUSHING DEFENSE (ypg)

1. Georgia 45.75
9. Vanderbilt 124.25
12. Arkansas 185.33

SCORING DEFENSE (ppg)

1. Kentucky 6.33
8. Vanderbilt 17.00
12. Arkansas 33.33

SCORING OFFENSE (ppg)

1. Florida 37.33
6. Vanderbilt 29.75
12. Mississippi State 14.25

TOTAL DEFENSE (ypg)

1. Florida 213.00
12. Vanderbilt 364.25

TOTAL OFFENSE (ypg)

1. Georgia 450.00
12. Vanderbilt 282.75

TURNOVERS GAINED (tot)

1. Vanderbilt 14
12. Arkansas 1

TURNOVERS LOST (tot)

1. Florida 0
6. Vanderbilt 5
11. USC/MSU 12

TURNOVER MARGIN (net pg)

1. Florida 3.00
2. Vanderbilt 2.25
12. Arkansas -2.00

SACKS (spg)

1. Vanderbilt 2.75
12. Tennessee 1.00

TACKLES FOR LOSS (pg)

1. Mississippi 8.75
10. Vanderbilt 5.25
12. Arkansas 5.00